The Racist Negro
February 12, 2011
As always, it has been some time since I last took the trouble to venture forth my opinion on a particular subject pertaining to the Negro, and release it upon the world. However my torpor has been most rudely awakened by the despicable Sonia Carr.
We all know the likes of this vile woman, she is a rabble rouser, a troublemaker, she is someone of low morals. Like others of her ilk, she claims to have noble aims – battling racism when in fact she is the antithesis of what she claims.
Sonia Carr is one of those horrible people that see racism in every off hand remark, in every action, in every dark corner, and behind the eyes of anyone not of the same colour as herself.
Sonia Carr is the Negro equivalent of the white far right, she doesn’t just see the potential racist in every white face however, she knows there is a racist behind every white face and she is just waiting for the mask to slip, to raise her hue and cry. To her of course it makes no nevermind whether they are racist or not, merely whether she is offended by them, and she invariably is.
The irony is, some fool, no doubt a liberal middle class white person, thought it apt to make such a dreadful woman a member of the Wiltshire Racial Equality Council, purely because she is a Negro! And the witless woman then took it upon herself to justify her lofty position by finding racism where none exists.
The most recent event that caused this sad excuse for a Negro to cry racism was when a white person used the phrase ‘jungle drums’, I kid ye not. In blatant defiance of common sense she said:
“The remark was racist and my complaint is valid. People need to think before they say things that could cause offence.”
Failing to perhaps take her own advice. As a fellow Negro I can honestly say that phrase is not offensive and the fact that she did find it offensives lends more to the bizarre workings of her mind than to the person uttering it intentions. Other than the mention of the word jungle I cannot for the life of me fathom what she found offensive, but perhaps the rest of her complaint makes this clear
Sonia Carr went on to complain that the use of that term had caused her real pain and had had an impact on her health and on her family. It is sickening that someone, and someone of colour at that, can use such a serious issue as racism to make such ridiculous and frankly puerile claims. Worse, that those claims can be upheld.
This racist Negro has made complaints before however, once against the same company at other times against the Fire Brigade and also against Wiltshire Police. Her complaint against her local police force is apparently due to the fact that there was a lack of black faces on the recruitment posters! As if remarking about such a thing wasn’t in itself racist, Wiltshire has a less than 1% black population, so unless there were 100 faces on those posters, she has no real reason to complain.
Sonia Carr it seems has made a career of frivolous claims of racism, and the Equality Act 2010 has just given this destestable woman a loaded gun, not only a right to be offended by anything and anyone, but a need for it. Were this odious Negro white (as if such a thing could happen!), she would be called a vile racist. I see no reason to reserve that judgement merely because he happens to have had Negro ancestors.
The fact that she holds such a privileged position within the council is a slap in the face for every fair minded person in the county, most particulary white people. They may as well add Nick Griffin to the Racial Equality Council, indeed they may find him slightly less biased, vindicative and racist.
White People and Niggers
August 22, 2010
Well it has certainly been a while since I have both found the time and taken the trouble to post something on this site, more than a year in fact; but I found myself complaining to a friend about this story, and thought that it would be better for both of us for me to post it here.
The story I am referring to is of course the recent conviction of musician Aaron Fagan of sexual assault. This travesty of justice once again proves that all white people are simply racist xenophobes who use any and every opportunity to persecute and destroy any man (or indeed woman) of colour. It makes me sick to my stomach to see these hard-working Negroes having their efforts, their dreams and their lives ruined by the odious race that is the white race.
“I’m a black man and I have been tried by a white jury. It’s pretty clear what happened in that court and it’s the opposite of justice.”
Which says it all really. This poor innocent soul has been chewed up and regurgitated by the most despicable race on earth, the white race.
I do of course jest, as is clear from the rest of this man’s statement:
Tell me how many people could have been convicted for squeezing a girl’s arse, nearly every guy could be up for that.
Hmm. I have of course dressed up my extreme anger in what is perhaps misguided humour, but I truly cannot express my ire without resorting to profanity, something I rarely do, or heading off on a rant. It troubles me deeply that such an opinion pervades the young black community, but it does, it really does. White people are not some vile breed, waiting for a Negro to slip up so that they can dig the knife in, they are invariably not racist, if they were, would us Negroes really be here?
Then why do so many young Negroes think like Aaron Fagan? Why do they blame every set back upon some unfortunate white person who happens to either report them for their crimes, or finds them guilty of them?
Let’s be clear about Fagan, he is guilty, and as a fellow Negro I would also have found him guilty. Moreover I am sure that he is guilty of far more that he has been convicted of here and I really hope that they throw the book at this loathsome man. This has nothing to do with the colour of this lecherous man’s skin, but his own stupidity coupled with his arrogance and disrespect for women. He admitted that unsolicited, he groped the two ladies bottoms, and then he went further and groped their breasts. Yet the fool sees nothing wrong with his actions, it makes me wonder if he’d be equally laid back were I to approach him and start groping his testicles, I am sure he wouldn’t be, but that is precisely what he did to these poor girls.
I am sure that he has bullied many other women into compliance, the arrogant pervert also claimed:
The musician said in his testimony that he was like “honey to a swarm of bees” for female fans, and accused the women of lying.
Sickening, it truly is. Fortunately these women were in a public place, but I dread to think how many poor young girls have had to fight off this man’s amorous advances and worse, how many have failed.
It is becoming something of a learned response for young Negroes (even the not so young, like Naomi Campbell) to blame racism for everything that goes wrong, but Fagan also had a Plan B, you see it wasn’t just his dark skin that saw him convicted, but also his ‘profile’ which I presume means his ‘black culture’ persona. Let’s be clear this man has nothing to do with Negro culture, the culture he follows was not brought across on the slave ships, was not cultivated in the West Indies and was not brought here by my family or any of the other immigrants from the West Indies in the 1950s. This ‘culture’ and I use the term loosely, is as alien to me as his behaviour.
Sadly this type of behaviour and people like this man are some kind of beacon to the young, and I truly despair of them. When I think of what I, and my ancestors went through to get where we are and then see someone like this man, behaving in this way and then trying to pass the blame for his vile actions onto the nearest white person (as if what he was doing wasn’t wrong, but it is the motivations of those that caught him that was wrong), it enrages me. This man is not a Negro by any definition of term that I use, he just has dark skin, no, if I were to look for a word that sums up this man, and those like him, I can think of only one – nigger. People like Aaron Fagan typify the modern nigger, depraved, arrogant, lacking in respect and of course black, and the kind of black that has to be worn has a shield and a badge.
I don’t use this word lightly, I of course know its history and its connotations; ironically I don’t think that people like Fagan do, indeed I don’t think he’d bat an eye lid if I called him a nigger to his face, unless I was white. Nigger is a derogatory term, and yet these idiots call themselves it daily, with no hint of irony. These niggers are destroying, or perhaps have already destroyed Negro culture, and every time one of these imbeciles makes these kinds of claims they do more to destroy racial harmony than the likes of the National Front ever could.
When people like me and my ancestors were young, we strived to be like an English gentleman, polite, honourable, respectful and honest; there were those that said that Negroes couldn’t behave that way, as there were those that said we couldn’t read, write think etc. I’d like to think that we proved them wrong. Yet these niggers are behaving like the niggers that some believed Negroes to truly be all along, playing into the hands of people like the National Front. And such behaviour seems to be contagious amongst young Negroes.
When our youngsters behave like animals and blame and hate other races, they are playing a dangerous game. This is, after all, a white nation, where even other ethnic minorities have a low regard for us Negroes, and we should be attempting to prove them wrong, not right.
Robin Hood Murdered by Negro
April 12, 2009
For me, this is the straw that broke the camel’s back with regard to the formerly well respected British Broadcasting Corporation - a black Friar Tuck.
After destroying a whole generation’s enjoyment of the Arthurian legend by making the blonde, blue eyed Queen Guinevere black, quite regardless of the fact that this was an impossibility, they have now trampled all over the image of Friar Tuck.
No longer is the Friar a balding, rotund, educated man with a penchant for ale, now he has been transformed into a ‘hunky, fighting robed warrior.’
The BBC has once again treated me with contempt and further embarrassed me with their continuing Operation Get Behind the Darkies. It appears that the top brass at the BBC believe that by splashing black faces all over every programme that they air, they are somehow beyond reproach when it comes to race issues and can hide the fact that in reality they are one of the least diverse corporations in Britain, at least in upper management. No doubt the management also throw words around such as modern, trendy, uptodate and groovy.
It is easy to point the finger at the middle aged white old Etonians that run the BBC but white people in general must also bear some of the blame for this; how much longer are they going to allow their culture, traditions and even folklore be trampled over by such people? Such people I hasten to add, who are doing this not through a love of Negroes, but rather as a convenient smokescreen for their own racism.
The same people who will no doubt scream racist should a white objector point out the idiocy of their programming. Friar Tuck is white. I am well aware that in reality he did not exist, I am well aware also that Arthur did not exist, nor Guinevere but these are folklores and legends that have been around for centuries, what right have a few ex public school boys in suits to alter them purely to save face?
‘Our generation of kids won’t bat an eyelid at the fact Friar Tuck is black, but it’s important for me to get to play a role model.’
Naturally thanks to the wonderful British education system most children are oblivious to things like history. As for Friar Tuck being a role model, since when? He’s the overweight jovial drunkard, well done David for lapping up another white cast off. All the BBC have done is turn Friar Tuck black to keep the Negroes happy, well I for one am not happy.
Programmes such as Robin Hood are meant to entertain the young whilst also gently educating, instead we have a television programme so far removed from the period in which it were set, it may as well be situated in space. What do youngsters today glean from such a programme? That skin colour is irrelevant and more down to chance rather than the geographical location from which a person comes from? I am not black by a mere accident, it is because my ancestors evolved this skin colour to better protect themselves from their environment.
This is a minor issue compared to the big issue that this sort of thing disguises – slavery. Should one of Britain’s ill informed, ignorant youth do something out of the ordinary, and think for a moment about slavery, no doubt they’d consider that both British whites and British blacks were complicit in slavery, when this isn’t the case at all. Negroes came here as slaves and several hundred years after Robin Hood was set. Yet according to the BBC Negroes have always been here.
This will give our government even more cause to ditch large swaths of British history and instead teach things such as Twitting, MyFace and BoBo in schools, reserving the tricky stuff for, well probably just the historians. Gone will be the likes of Ignatius Sancho, William Wilberforce and already many children believe that Churchill is a fictional character (if not a nodding dog), despite Churchill only dying 44 years ago. Many teens also believe that Robin Hood was real and bizarrely, despite him appearing in many of the aforementioned Robin Hood’s tales, Richard the Lionheart as fictional!
Needless to say if they believe Robin Hood to be based on a real person, then likewise they’ll believe Friar Tuck to have been a black martial arts expert, rather than the portly man of God of the legends. This poorly conceived attempt to make the BBC appear Negro friendly has stripped this awful series of the last bit of credibility it may have held and also dropped the BBC beyond salvage in my regard.
It shouldn’t have surprised me however, particularly on the back of the black Guinevere, the Black Doctor Who, and the recent and even more infuriating All Black espisode of Eastenders. At the BBC it seems that 2009 is the year of the Negro.
I found the BBC episode particularly insulting, it was completely unnecessary and just another PR stunt intended to keep the Negroes happy. This wasn’t a landmark, there was nothing to celebrate in an episode tht purposely kept whites off screen purely with the intention of having an all black episode. In any event it was not an all black episode, merely an all non-white episode. This wasn’t even just centred around one family or one location, some scenes were in the public house, but just carefully crafted to ensure no white faces violated the episode. Indeed the bar had no bar staff as they are all white, so they simply ceased to exist in that episode. Black extras crowed every seat and featured in every walk by, purely to get Negroes on screen.
The BBC celebrated this as an all important milestone. I was shocked and angered that since the 1950s, that this programme claimed to deal with, we have reversed positions so much that it is now acceptable for the BBC to ban all actors of a certain colour from an episode, as long as that colour is white. Sure there may well be all white episodes, but that is by chance rather than design. The BBC set out to create an episode that featured only non whites, to me that is purely and simply racism. For even racism dressed up in good intentions is still racism.
The irony is that the BBC intended that episode to highlight the racism suffered by us Negroes as we arrived here 50 years ago, by segregating the cast and having a no whites policy. One wonders if they had a sign outside the studio that day, No Whites, No Irish and No Dogs. The fact that the BBC used racism to highlight racism appears to be lost on just about everyone, I find no mention of this anywhere else on the internet. But naturally whites dare not complain and after all Negro is most certainly in vogue at present, what with Obama (I won’t even start on that particular topic!). The upper echelons of the BBC must have been positively beside themselves at his election as now they can have far more Negro on TV, at no extra cost.
The fact that the episode also went out on the tenth anniversary of the Macpherson report, a fact that the BBC claimed to be coincidence, not only insults my intelligence but also feels like a further slap in the face.
‘A BBC spokeswoman said last night that it had never been intended as a black episode.’
And yet no white people were featured in either the Cafe, or the public house? And all the extras were black? All by accident? They also refused to confirm or deny that the episode was also written by blacks.
I am sure that many whites saw this episode as a criticism of whites, labelling them racists and criticising the conduct of their ancestors once again. Such programming is hardly the best way of promoting racial harmony, but that is just typical of the BBC, they believe that ethnicitising white characters will somehow keep the Negroes happy with the lack of top BBC officials, and either fail to realise or care about the possible white backlash. Such actions by the BBC only breed hate and resentment, but fortunately for the upper class white men at the top of the BBC, the backlash is not something that they need to worry about.
The Black Doctor
January 3, 2009
It’s been six months since my last post and I honestly believed that I had covered everything that I wanted to and discussed all of the points that had enticed me into starting a blog in the first place, but recent news has compelled me to post once again.
I have been a fan of Doctor Who ever since I was a boy. It is a quintessentially British programme that I enjoyed immensely growing up.
I won’t say who my favourite Doctor was, as it would show my age, suffice to say he was more of a Grandfatherly figure than the modern Doctors.
It may come as a surprise to some, but I am actually saddened by the news that the new actor replacing David Tennant is black.
Negroes Need White’s Cast Off’s
July 26, 2008
As a boy I loved the Arthurian legends, and let’s be honest, what young boy could fail to be captivated by those tall tales of magic, chivalry and swordsmanship.
Because of this I was quite looking forward to the new BBC adaptation of these legends, even though it would be primarily aimed at children.
Initially I was saddened by the news that ‘Merlin’ as it was to be called would be based on Merlin and Arthur as two boys and would not follow the old legends in any way shape or form.
Next the BBC went on to insult my intelligence and my race by having Queen Genevieve played by a Negro.
I have mentioned before that it seems to be in fashion at present to criticise movies and TV for not featuring enough black faces, Spike Lee recently criticised Clint Eastwood for not having any, or enough, Negroes in his movies. Next, incredibly the head of equality in the UK has claimed that British television is too white!
Campbell wouldn’t know racism if she tripped over it
June 25, 2008
When I was a boy things were decidedly different in this country, it was a time of change and upheaval. Britain had emerged from WWII poorer, Empireless and weak and for those that had grown up in the most powerful nation on earth, this was quite a shocking change.
For most the Empire was an abstract concept, they knew it existed, they also knew that it belonged to Britain, but for most the peoples of the Empire were conquered peoples, subjugated and in many cases deemed to be savage or primitive. It was quite a shock then during this time of change, for the former peoples of the Empire to arrive in Britain and to live and work amongst them.
Read the rest of this entry »
Eastwood puts Lee in his place
June 24, 2008
After a long absence it seems that I am picking up right where I left off, another black celebrity bemoaning the lack of black faces in the media. This time however it is US director, Spike Lee who said of Eastwood’s film Flags of our Fathers;
That was his version. The Negro version did not exist
An extremely pointless and unhelpful comment but one that seems to pervade the mentality of many leading black celebrities. As if every historical event should be based on today’s ethnic make up, rather than reality.
Read the rest of this entry »
How many is enough?
February 16, 2008
I was quite surprised to hear Lenny Henry complaining recently about a lack of ethnic diversity on television. He said:
“When I started, I was surrounded by a predominantly white workforce, and 32 years later, not a lot has changed,”
I am not sure what he really expects to see in his workplace, but with 90% of people in the UK being white, almost all workforces are likely to be predominately white. The laws of probability states that for every 100 people in the television industry, just 2 will be black and 90 will be white.
When I was a boy, the only time that I would see a black man on TV was when my father walked over to turn the set on and I caught sight of his reflection. These days television is positively brimming with black people, and other ethnic minorities for that matter. Certainly a marked change from a few decades ago. Indeed, Lenny Henry claims that nothing has changed since he started his career, but that isn’t true. Lenny Henry was unique, because he was the only black comic on TV at that time. I remember seeing him for the first time on New Faces.
Black Heritage and Culture
February 10, 2008
Nottingham has in recent years become almost as famous for its crime rate than for its legendary son, Robin Hood. Nicknames such as Assasination City and Shootingham say it all really, so I wasn’t too surprised to hear of boys from a Nottingham school being excluded for bringing in a knife.
That was until I read that they were primary school children.
Three boys have been excluded for seven days and a 10-year-old boy they allegedly threatened has been told to stay away for three days.
A vegetable knife was found in the bag of the 10-year-old who attends St Ann’s Well Junior School, Nottingham.
Why I’m a negro – and proud of it
February 7, 2008
I understand that some people may be offended by the term ‘Negro’, the ironic thing is, most of them are probably white. There are reasons why I use the term Negro rather than others.
Initially I had intended to write this blog from a 18th Century perspective as Ignatius Sancho, even writing as such e.g. thou shallst readeth mine blog with reverence etc, however that grew very tiresome before even the first post. I did however like the archaic word Negro.