Well it seems that no sooner was my ban lifted on the prejudiced blog of Stefania Harris, than it was reimposed. I did however manage to make one comment that was retained, pointing out the errors with the original post, comment number 85 is mine.

Again Steph, who at this point had assumed the persona of an 18 girl called Amie, changed my name to ‘Gareth’ but rather than troll, this time I was labelled ‘retard’. Ha Ha, such hilarity! It never grows old! My name isn’t Gareth yet she continuously addresses me as such, ha ha!

‘Amie’ went on to answer my comment stating:

@ Gareth

You’re so stupid.

I admit, I was dumbfounded by such a witty retort, but I read on.

No one ever said that interracial relationships were uncommon in the black community. Steph said it wasn’t common for white women to date black men and the number interracial marriages is 2% of the total.

Females are over 50% of the population. White females are 92% of the female population. Black men are less than 1% of the male population. And you want to look at the percentage of black men dating white women to make a statement about interracial dating in the UK?

*roll eyes*

‘Amie’ I don’t see your point. The original post clearly implied that Britain, and white people in general, were racist and had negative attitudes towards black people. The primary focus was that white women do not date black men.

This is completely untrue; you then roll out a lot of percentages that only prove one thing, it is impossible for more than 600,000 women (1% of the population) to be dating black men, as there is only 600,000 black men in the UK!

Furthermore you ignore that fact that mixed race children (those born of black and white parents) will soon outnumber black people in Britain, proving categorically that white people and black people not only date, but also have sex and therefore children!

Your view of a racist Britain is a complete fallacy and entirely based on a childish and ignorant grasp of maths and percentages!

*Slaps Head*

Further affirmation that Ms Harris is conceding that she was fallacious:

In the UK inter-ethnic relationships are set to rise but not black-white relationships. The continuation of the black population at is current levels is very unlikely because although interracial relationship are extremely rare per percentage of the population, they are common in the black population.

Pardon? Kindly repeat that last part…

because although interracial relationship are extremely rare per percentage of the population, they are common in the black population.

Naturally, and the black population is the only one of consequence when discussing interracial relationships within the black community, isn’t it Stefania? Obviously the number of white women dating black men is going to be low because, as Jake pointed out in the comments, there are 25+ million white women and only 600,000 black men, so it is the number of black men that are dating white women that is important and the best indicator of interracial relationships.

With around 50% of black men currently dating a white woman, you could say that it is clear that interracial relationships are the norm.

I tried to post this, as usual on Steph’s blog, but as usual it was deleted. It was in response to this comment by Stefania Harris:

0.4% of white women in England and Wales are in mixed-ethnic marriages, which is 1% of the 9,900,000 married white women in England and Wales. Less than 1-2,500 is married to a black Caribbean man. The number of black males over 16 is less than 1% of the population of England and Wales.

Hmm interesting, so Steph, what you are basically saying is that 17% of black Caribbean men in Britain are married to white women? Well that is good, especially as only 50% of black men are married, which means that a third of married black men, are married to white women!

Glad that we agree on something at last. We can also assume that those dating black men would be higher than those married to black men. Maybe you are starting to realise that you are wrong?

You also missed an important point on that census page that you linked to:

Almost five in ten Other Black men (48 per cent) and three in ten Black Caribbean men (29 per cent) were married to women outside the Black ethnic group, in most cases White women.

And…

For example, among men who described their own ethnic group as ‘Mixed – White and Black Caribbean’, 76 per cent were married to White women, 8 per cent to Black Caribbean women and 11 per cent to ‘Mixed – White and Black Caribbean’ women.

So 76% of mixed race men, men like Barack Obama, Lewis Hamilton and Craig Charles, are married to white women. If you count mixed race interracial relationships as well as black, well then they are even more widespread than even I believed.

It is good to see that there are still people confronting Stefania Harris over her views of blacks and racism in the UK. Darryl makes some interesting points, but he, like most of the readers of that blog perhaps, are missing the big point about the statistics that Steph uses.

Those statistics don’t mean anything.

50% of black men over 16 in the UK aren’t married! The marriage statistics may well be where a white catholic girl would logically go to find information on Britain’s interracial mix, but any negro would tell you that marriage is not the be all and end all of relationships.

Furthermore 50% of black men in the UK have white partners! Half of them! Yet the woman continues to claim that not only are black men abhorrent, they are not very fertile as:

The number of mixed race children proves that very few white women conceive to black men.

Wrong again Ms Harris! Within a few years the number of mixed race children in the UK will out number the black children. You see, the negro seed is strong Ms Harris, despite your bizarre and quite frankly racist claims.